RESEARCH PAPER
Effects of Using Various Methods for Car Shock Absorbers Diagnostic Tests
Marek Guzek 1  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Transport, Division of Vehicle Maintenance and Operation, Warsaw University of Technology, Polska
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Marek Guzek   

Faculty of Transport, Division of Vehicle Maintenance and Operation, Warsaw University of Technology, Polska
Publication date: 2020-06-30
Submission date: 2020-06-05
Final revision date: 2020-06-25
Acceptance date: 2020-06-29
 
The Archives of Automotive Engineering – Archiwum Motoryzacji 2020;88(2):99–108
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The work concerns the diagnostic assessment of the technical condition of the car suspension. The paper discusses practical problems that usually appear during testing of car shock absorbers mounted in a vehicle. The results of experimental tests for passenger car, carried out according to the EUSAMA standard test, were compared with the results obtained using newer methods (phase angle method and half power bandwidth method – HPBM). The article also deals with the issue of incompatibility of typical excitation at diagnostic devices for testing suspension with the one that often occurs in road conditions (by simulation method). The main purpose of the work was to assess the usefulness and reliability of various diagnostic methods intended for the testing of vehicle shock absorbers without disassembly them from the vehicle. The analyses carried out indicated the advantages and disadvantages of these methods in practice. It is also shown that the conditions of diagnostic tests correspond poorly to the operating conditions of the shock absorbers under normal vehicle operating conditions. An important factor in this case is the sliding friction in the suspension.
 
REFERENCES (19)
1.
1995 ISO 8608 Mechanical vibration – Road surface profiles – Reporting of measured data.
 
2.
Arbeláez-Toro JJ., Rodriguez-Ledesma CM., Hincapié-Zuluaga DA., Torres-Lopez EA.: Adherence Evaluation of a MacPherson Suspension under EuSAMA Norm in a Mathematical Model and one Multibody. TecnoLógicas. 2013, 757–768, DOI: 10.22430/22565337.344.
 
3.
Balsarotti S., Bradley W.: Experimental Evaluation of a Non-Intrusive Automotive Suspension Testing Apparatus. SAE Technical Paper. 2000, 2000-01-1329, 90461, DOI: 10.4271/2000-01-1329.
 
4.
Calvo JA., Diaz V., San Román JL.: Establishing inspection criteria to verify the dynamic behaviour of the vehicle suspension system by a platform vibrating test bench. International Journal of Vehicle Design. 2005, 38(4), 290–306, DOI: 10.1504/IJVD.2005.007623.
 
5.
Calvo JA., Diaz V., San Roman JL., García-Pozuelo D.: Influence of shock absorber wearing on vehicle brake performance. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2008, 9(4), 467–472, DOI: 10.1007/s12239-008-0056-z.
 
6.
Calvo JA., San Román JL., Alvarez-Caldas C.: Procedure to verify the suspension system on periodical motor vehicle inspection. International Journal of Vehicle Design. 2013, 63(1), 1–17, DOI: 10.1504/IJVD.2013.055497.
 
7.
Jimin He, Zhi-Fang Fu.: Modal analysis. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, 2001, ISBN 0 7506 5079 6.
 
8.
Klapka M., Mazůrek I., Kubìk M., Macháček O.: Reinvention of the EUSAMA diagnostic methodology. International Journal of Vehicle Design. 2017, 74(4), 304–318, DOI: 10.1504/IJVD.2017.087968.
 
9.
Klapka M., Mazůrek I., Macháček O., Kubík M.: Twilight of the EUSAMA diagnostic methodology. Meccanica. 2017, 52(9), 2023–2034, DOI: 10.1007/s11012-016-0566-0.
 
10.
Lozia Z., Zdanowicz P.: Simulation assessment of the impact of inertia of the vibration plate of a diagnostic suspension tester on results of the EUSAMA test of shock absorbers mounted in a vehicle. International Automotive Conference (KONMOT 2018) IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 421(2), 022018, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/421/2/022018.
 
11.
Martinod RM., Betancur GR., Mesa JF., Benavides OM., Castañeda LF.: Analysis of the procedure for suspension evaluation of civil armoured vehicles: reliability and safety driving criteria. International Journal of Vehicle Safety. 2013, 6(3), 254–264, DOI: 10.1504/IJVS.2013.055024.
 
12.
Recommendation for a performance test specification of an ‘on-car’ vehicle suspension testing system. Publication TS 02 76. European Shock Absorber Manufacturers Association. Nottingham, England (1976).
 
13.
Šarkan B., Vrábel J., Skrúcaný T., Ševčík M.: Methods of assessing the technical condition of automotive shock absorbers in the road vehicles operation. International Scientific Journal "Machines. Technologies. Materials”. 2015, 9, 7, 52–54, PRINT ISSN 1313-0226.
 
14.
Stańczyk TL., Jurecki R.: Analiza porównawcza metod badania amortyzatorów hydraulicznych (Comparative analysis of testing methods of hydraulic shock absorbers). Proceedings of the Institute of Vehicles/Warsaw University of Technology. 2014, 4(100), 25–45, ISSN 1642-347X.
 
15.
Toma M., Andreescu C., Stan C.: Influence of tire inflation pressure on the results of diagnosing brakes and suspension. Procedia Manufacturing. 2018, 22, 121–128, DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.019.
 
16.
Tsymberov A.: An improved non-intrusive automotive suspension testing apparatus with means to determine the condition of the dampers. SAE Technical Paper. 1996, 960735, DOI: 10.4271/960735.
 
17.
United States Patent No. 5,369,974. Suspension tester and method. Date of Patent: Dec. 6, 1994. Inventor: Tsymberov A.
 
18.
Zdanowicz P.: Comparative assessment of vertical vibrations of a vehicle on the road and during the EUSAMA test. International Automotive Conference (KONMOT 2018) IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018, 421(2), 022045, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/421/2/022045.
 
19.
Zdanowicz P.: Ocena stanu amortyzatorów pojazdu z uwzględnieniem tarcia suchego w zawieszeniu (Assessment of the condition of vehicle’s shock absorbers with taking into account the dry friction in the suspension system). Doctoral dissertation. Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, Warszawa, 2012.
 
eISSN:2084-476X