Research of the TQM evaluation in a service company
More details
Hide details
Department of Road and Urban Transport, University of Žilina
Department of Economics, University of Žilina
Department of Road and Urban Transport, University of Zilina
Ekaterina Salamakhina   

Department of Road and Urban Transport, University of Žilina
Submission date: 2021-09-08
Final revision date: 2021-09-22
Acceptance date: 2021-09-23
Publication date: 2021-09-30
The Archives of Automotive Engineering – Archiwum Motoryzacji 2021;93(3):27–37
TQM is a term associated mainly with ensuring the quality of production, where the emphasis is on quality in all parts of the production process. The introduction of TQM into the operation of a service company therefore seems to be more difficult. In the presented article we address the basic requirements for the introduction of TQM in a company providing road freight transport. The basic PDCA approach needs to be implemented in all processes of the actors involved in the supply chain. The article points out the fact that evaluating the quality of the provided service only on the basis of a single indicator, which is the monitoring of the number of complaints and claims, is not sufficient as evidence of the established TQM system. The customer requires evidence of long-term and serious monitoring. As part of this monitoring, it proposes the creation of an effective evaluation system for evaluating the quality of the external service provider. To determine the priority requirements of the customer, it is appropriate to apply several known simple evaluation methods. In the article, we applied the pairwise comparison method and the Saaty’s method to determine the order of importance of the quality criteria that we previously found in the customer survey: integrity of the consignment, compliance with the agreed delivery time and completeness of the shipment, including documents. We therefore recommend focusing on these criteria when providing TQM in the company.
Baird K., Hu K.J., Reeve R.: The relationships between organizational culture, total quality management practices and operational performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2011, 31(7), 789 – 814, DOI: 10.1108/01443571111144850.
Coatney K., Poliak M.: Cognitive Decision-Making Algorithms, Internet of Things Smart Devices, and Sustainable Organizational Performance in Industry 4.0-based Manufacturing Systems. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics. 2020, 8(4), 9–18, DOI: 10.22381/JSME8420201.
Durana P., Valaskova K., Vagner L., Zadnanova S., Podhorska I., Siekelova A.: Disclosure of Strategic Managers’ Factotum: Behavioral Incentives of Innovative Business. International Journal of Financial Studies. 2020, 8(17), DOI: 10.3390/ijfs8010017.
Durana P., Zauskova A., Vagner L., Zadnanova S.: Earnings drivers of slovak manufacturers: Efficiency assessment of innovation management. Applied Sciences. 2020, 10(12), 4251, DOI: 10.3390/app10124251.
Gnap J., Konecny V.: Quality evaluation of road freight transport services and customers satisfaction. Quality Management of Services. 2006. University of Žilina. ISBN 80-8070-573-9.
Khan R.A., Mirza A., Khushnood M.: The Role of Total Quality Management Practices on Operational Performance of the Service Industry. International Journal for Quality Research. 2020, 14(2), 439–454, DOI: 10.24874/IJQR14.02-07.
Kliestik T., Nica E., Musa H., Poliak M., Mihai E.-A.: Networked, Smart, and Responsive Devices in Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Systems. Economics, Management and Financial Markets. 2020, 15(3), 23–29, DOI: 10.22381/EMFM15320203.
Kułakowski K.: Inconsistency in the ordinal pairwise comparisons method with and without ties. European Journal of Operational Research. 2018, 270(1), 314–327, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.03.024.
Kumar V., Han Y., Truong N.T., Hoang N.Y.N., Upadhyay A.: Understanding the Interrelationship Between Culture of Quality, Employee and Organizational Performance. Operations and Supply Chain Management. 2020, 14(1), 14–25, DOI: 10.31387/oscm0440282.
Mitreva E., Sazdova J., Gjorshevski H.: Application of Total Management of Quality in the Macedonian Hotel Industry. Quality – Access to Success. 2019, 20(172), 68–72.
Mitreva E., Tashkova S., Gjorshevski H.: Optimization of Business Processes in a Transport Company in The Republic of North Macedonia. TEM Journal – Technology, Education, Management, Informatics. 2019, 8(3), 879–887, DOI: 10.18421/TEM83-27.
Orsic J., Rosi B., Jereb B.: Measuring Sustainable Performance among Logistic Service Providers in Supply Chains. Tehnicki vjesnik-technical gazette. 2019, 26(5), 1478–1485, DOI: 10.17559/TV-20180607112607.
Othman I., Ghani S.M.M., Choon S.W.: The Total Quality Management (TQM) journey of Malaysian building contractors. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2020, 11(3), 697–704, DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2019.11.002.
Poliak M., Baker A., Konecny V., Nica E.: Regulatory and Governance Mechanisms for Self-Driving Cars: Social Equity Benefits and Machine Learning-based Ethical Judgments. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice. 2020, 12(1), 58–64, DOI: 10.22381/CRLSJ12120208.
Poliak M., Semanova S., Mrnikova M., Komackova L., Simurkova P., Poliakova A., et al.: Financing public transport services form public funds. Transport problems. 2017, 12(4), 61–72, DOI: 10.20858/tp.2017.12.4.6.
Sarancanlao J.V.S., Juliet E.L., Linden L.E., Love C.L., Sofia C.N.: Total Quality Zero Waste Management System. Revista Genero & Direito. 2019, 8(7), 231–265, DOI: 10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n7.50021.
Shabanpour H., Faithi A., Yousefi S., Sean R.F.: Ranking sustainable suppliers using congestion approach of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019, 240, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118190.
Vasiliev V.A., Aleksandrova S.V., Aleksandrov M.N., Velmakina Yu.V.: Possibilities for the Integration of Quality Management Tools and Methods with Digital Technologies. Russian Metallurgy. 2020, 2020(13), 1649–1652, DOI: 10.1134/S003602952013039X.
Wang P., Marley K., Vogt J.J., Mileski J.: Contextual efect on the LSS implementation in networked service environments A critical realism case study for the Port of Houston. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2019, 37(5), 755–780, DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-02-2019-0052.
Wang Y.N., Shi Y.: Measuring the Service Quality of Urban Rail Transit Based on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Model. KSCE Journal of Civil Engeneering. 2019, 24(2), 647–656, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-020-0937-x.
Declaration of availability