RESEARCH PAPER
Demand specifics of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility for bus transport. Case of regional bus transport in Slovakia
Mária Brídziková 1  
,  
Vladimír Konečný 1  
,  
Juraj Hammer 1  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Road and Urban Transport, University of Zilina
2
Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, University of Zagreb
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Mária Brídziková   

Department of Road and Urban Transport, University of Zilina
Publication date: 2020-03-30
Submission date: 2020-03-02
Final revision date: 2020-03-15
Acceptance date: 2020-03-20
 
The Archives of Automotive Engineering – Archiwum Motoryzacji 2020;87(1):81–95
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Presupposition for realizing the demand for bus transport is the existence of its potential, which represents the population of that city, region, or state. Public passenger transport is considered to be an instrument of state social policy. The legislation defines it as transport performed to satisfaction the transport needs of persons, especially vulnerable groups, pupils, students, and pensioners. A significant problem in Slovakia and also in abroad is an aging population. The retired population has different transport habits like other groups of passengers (children, pupils and students, economically active persons), which is related to the change of transport requirements, as well as an adaptation the public transport offer. In recent years, the number of license holders of individual disabled persons has been increasing in Slovakia, or possibly individual person with severe disability with a guide. In this article, we focus on examining the issue of the rising trend of issued valid licenses of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility, and related new measures, to which transport undertakings are confronted and transport service subscribers. The aim is also to identify the motivation to own a disability person license or persons with reduced mobility with the ability to use it for the demand for public passenger transport.
 
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Alonso A., Monzon A., Cascajo R.: Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in Europin city. Ecological Indicators. 2015, 48, 578–592, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.022.
 
2.
Buehler R., Pucher J.: Making public transport financially sustainable. Transport Policy. 2011, 18(1), 126–138, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.002.
 
3.
Buhler C., Heck H., Becker J.: How to inform people with reduced mobility about public transport. Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Proceedings. 2008, 5150, 973+.
 
4.
Dydkowski G., Gnap J.: Premises and limitations of free public transport implementation. Communications – Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina. 2019, 21(4), 13–18, ISSN:13364205.
 
5.
Fatima K., Moridpour S.: Measuring public transport accessibility for elderly. MATEC Web of Conferences 2018 6th International Conference on Traffic and Logistic Engineering (ICTLE 2018). 2019, 259, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201925903006.
 
6.
Fatima K., Moridpour S., Saghapour T., De Gruyter C.: A case study of elderly public transport accessibility. 2018 Asia-Pacific Conference on Intelligent Medical (APCIM)/2018 7Th International Conference on Transportation and Traffic Engineering (ICTTE2018). 2018, 253–257, DOI: 10.1145/3321619.3321651.
 
7.
Gašparík J., Stopka O., Pečený L.: Quality evaluation in regional passenger rail transport. Naše More. 2015, 62(3), 114–118, DOI: 10.17818/NM/2015/SI5.
 
8.
Hansson J., Pettersson F., Svensson H., Wretstrand A.: Preferences in regional public transport: a literature review. European Transport Research Review. 2019, 11(1), DOI: 10.1186/s12544-019-0374-4.
 
9.
Holmgren J.: A strategy for increased public transport usage – The effects of implementing a welfare maximizing policy. Research in Transportation Economics. 2014, 48, 221–226, DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.046.
 
10.
Holmgren J.: An analysis of the determinants of local public transport demand focusing the effects of income changes. European Transport Research Review. 2013, 5(2), 101–107, DOI: 10.1007/s12544-013-0094-0.
 
11.
Ibarra-Rojas O.J., Delgado F., Giesen R., Munoz J.C.: Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems:A literature review. Transportation Research Part B-Methodologigal. 2015, 77, 38–75, DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.03.002.
 
12.
Ingvardson J.B., Nielsen O.A.: How urban density, network topology and socio-economy influence public transport ridership: Empirical evidence from 48 European metropolitan areas. Journal of Transport Geography. 2018, 72, 50–63, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.07.002.
 
13.
Kalasova A., Mikulski J., Kubikova S.: The impactof intelligent transport systems on an accident rate of the chosen part of road communication network in the Slovak republic. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2016, 640, 47–58, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49646-7_5.
 
14.
Kalasova A., Cernicky L., Hamar M.: A New Approach to Road Safety in Slovakia, Telematics in the Transport Environment. Communications in Computer and Information Science. 2012, 329, 388–395, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34050-5_44.
 
15.
Kral P., Janoskova K., Kliestik T.: Key determinants of the public transport user´s satisfaction. Administratie si Management Public. 2018, 31, 36–51, DOI: 10.24818/amp/2018.31-03.
 
16.
Ludici A., Bertoli L., Faccio E.: The “invisible”needs of women with disabilities in transportation systems. Crime Prevention&Community Safety. 2017, 19(3-4), 264–275, DOI: 10.1057/s41300-017-0031-6.
 
17.
Metz D.: Demographic determinants of daily travel demand. Transport Policy. 2012, 21, 20–25, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.007.
 
18.
Mouratidis K., Ettema D., Naess P.: Urban form, travel behavior, and travel satisfaction. Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice. 2019, 129, 306–320, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.002.
 
19.
Mrnikova M., Poliak M., Šimurková P., Reuter N.: Why is important establishment of the organizer in integrated transport system in Slovak republic? 2018 XI International Science and Technical Conference Automotive Safety. 2018, DOI: 10.1109/AUTOSAFE.2018.8373318.
 
20.
Paulley N., Balcombe R., Mackett R., Titheridge H., Preston J., Wardman M., et al.: The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transport Policy. 2006, 13(4), 295–306, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.004.
 
21.
Poliak M.: Procedure for award of contracts and contracting in public passenger transport. Urban Transport Systems, 2017, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/6482....
 
22.
Poliak M.: The relationship with reasonable profit and risk in public passenger transport in the Slovakia. Ekonomicky Casopis. 2013, 61(2), 206–220.
 
23.
Poliak M., Simurkova P., Cheu K.: Wage inequality across the road transport sector within the EU. Transport Problems. 2019, 14(2), 145–153, DOI: 10.20858/tp.2019.14.2.13.
 
24.
Starzynska B., Kujawinska A., Grabowska M., Diakun J., Wiecek-Janka E., Schnieder L, et al.: Requirements elicitation of passengers with reduced mobility for the design of high quality, accessible and inclusive public transport services. Management and Production Engineering Review. 2015, 6(3), 70–76, DOI: 10.1515/mper-2015-0028.
 
25.
Veternik M., Gogola M.: Examining of correlation between demographic development of population and their travel behaviour. 12th International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists on Sustainable, Modern and Safe Transport. 2017, 192, 929–934, DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.160.
 
26.
Winska M., Gzik A.: Determining the level of satisfaction among users of public transport in Lublin. The Archiwes of Automotive Engineering – Archiwum Motoryzacji. 2019, 85(3), 19–39, DOI: 10.14669/AM.VOL85.ART2.
 
eISSN:2084-476X