RESEARCH PAPER
Maintenance system of semi-trailer and risk priority number
Dalibor Barta 1  
,  
Jana Gallikova 1  
,  
Jacek Caban 2  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zilina, Slovak Republic
2
Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Polska
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Dalibor Barta   

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 1, 010 26, Žilina, Slovak Republic
Publication date: 2019-12-23
Submission date: 2019-11-29
Final revision date: 2019-12-16
Acceptance date: 2019-12-17
 
The Archives of Automotive Engineering – Archiwum Motoryzacji 2019;86(4):101–109
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The new maintenance system of semi-trailer combination as a most used road freight transport means is the subject of interest in this article. The real experiences from practice and creation of the FMEA analysis of the system using software support are the basis of wear and damage analysis of air brake system components used on the semi-trailer combination. The desire to improve market position of the company, customer satisfaction, but also the product specifications, government regulatory requirements, agency recommendations, and legal implications are the grounds for continuous improvement of the product quality, reliability and safety. These reasons push the product manufacturers to perform risk analyses, which helps them identify and minimize system failures during the life cycle of product. One of the risk analysis techniques recommended by international standards to identify possible failure causes is the FMEA methodology. It helps to locate the failures and reduce their consequences, so that the intended function of the machine is fulfilled. In this paper was presented the wear and damage analysis of individual components of air brake system and creating of the FMECA analysis for semi-trailer combination. Base on them, new methods to detect failures of components of air systems, preventive measures and set up of a new planned preventive maintenance system for air brakes was designed. The cost of the proposed maintenance system is 2.2 times higher than the cost of the current maintenance system, but it minimizes the failures and their consequences (traffic accidents).
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Cernicky L., Kalasova A.: The application of telematic technologies in Slovakia - the possibility of improving road safety in the Slovak Republic. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport. 2015, 86, 5–11.
 
2.
Ding N., Shi X., Zhang Y., Chen W., Shi X., Zhang Y., Chen W. Analysis of bifurcation and stability for a tractor semi-trailer in planar motion. Vehicle System Dynamics. 2014, 52 (12), 1729–1751, DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2014.960431.
 
3.
Dizo J., Blatnicky M.: Use of multibody system dynamics as a tool for the vehicle behaviour diagnostics. Zeszyty Naukowe Instytutu Pojazdow: mechanika, ekologia, bezpieczeństwo, mechatronika. 2015, 3(103), 37–46.
 
4.
Dizo J., Blatnicky M.: Use of multibody system dynamics as a tool for rail vehicle behaviour diagnostics. Diagnostyka. 2016, 17(2), 9–16.
 
5.
Drozdziel P., Krzywonos L., Madlenak R., Rybicka I.: Selected aspects of analyses of failure rates of active safety systems in buses. Communications-Scientific Letters of the University of Žilina. 2014, 16, 3, 114–119.
 
6.
Drozdziel P., Rybicka I., Madlenak R., Andrusiuk A., Siluch D.: The engine set damage assessment in the public transport vehicles. Advances in Science and Technology-Research Journal. 2017, 11(1), 117–127, DOI: 10.12913/22998624/66502.
 
7.
Grencik J., Poprocky R., Stuchly V., Zvolensky P.: Evolution of maintenance systems of passenger and freight wagons from the ECM certification point of view. Communications-Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina. 2014, 16(3A), 40–47.
 
8.
Grencik J., Ruman F.: Maintenance and failure consequences costs as a criterion for change of maintenance system - case study. 10th European Conference of Young Research and Scientific Workers, TRANSCOM 2013, 24-26 June 2013, Zilina, Slovakia, 2013, 253–256.
 
9.
Grencik J., Ruman F.: Proposal of new maintenance scheme of air brake system on semi-trailer combination. Diagnostyka. 2015, 16(2), 11–19.
 
10.
Kalasova A., Mikulski J., Kubikova A.: The impact of intelligent transport systems on an accident rate of the chosen part of road communication network in the Slovak Republic,” in 16th International Conference on Transport Systems Telematics (TST2016), Katowice Ustron, Poland, Mar. 16-19, 2016, Challenge of Transport Telematics, Edited by: Mikulski J., Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2016, 640, 47–58.
 
11.
Kulkarni A., Nanaware R., Kulkarni A., Garud V.: Synthesis and optimization of steering mechanism of extra-long semi-trailer vehicle. Procedia Structural Integrity. 2019, 14, 158–167, DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.05.021.
 
12.
Lee E., Kapoor S., Sikder T., He Y.: An optimal robust controller for active trailer differential braking systems of car-trailer combinations. International Journal of Vehicle Systems Modelling and Testing. 2017, 12(1–2), 72–93, DOI: 10.1504/IJVSMT.2017.10008917.
 
13.
Nieto A.B, Garcia J.L.S.R., Lopez V.D., Sanchez S.S.: Analysis of results obtained on vehicle technical inspection using fBRAKE in Spain and development of a new model for semi-trailers based on Regulation No. 13. International journal of heavy vehicle systems. 2018, 25(2), 163–188, DOI: 10.1504/IJHVS.2018.10011855.
 
14.
Rybicka I., Drozdziel P., Stopka O., Luptak V.: Methodology to propose a regional transport organization within specific integrated transport system: a case study. Transport Problems. 2018, 13(4), 115–125, DOI: 10.20858/tp.2018.13.4.11.
 
15.
Saderova J., Bindzar P.: Definition of logistics activities during building of a concreting plant. Carpathian Logistics Congress CLC, 2012.
 
16.
Skrúcaný T., Gnap J.: The effect of the crosswinds on the stability of the moving vehicles. 6th International Scientific Conference on Dynamic of Civil Engineering and Transport Structures and Wind Engineering. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014, 617, 296–301, DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.617.296.
 
17.
Skrucany T., Sarkan B., Gnap J.: Influence of aerodynamic trailer devices on drag reduction measured in a wind tunnel. Maintenance and Reliability. 2016, 18(1), 151–154.
 
18.
Stuchly V., Grencik J.: Calculation of preventive maintenance tasks using RCM method. Euromaintenance 2010, Conference, 12-14.5.2010 - Fiera di Verona - Italy, 207–209.
 
19.
Van de Molengraft-Luijten M.F.J., Besselink I.J.M., Verschuren R.M.A.F., Nijmeijer H.: Analysis of the lateral dynamic behaviour of articulated commercial vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics. 2012, 50(1), 169–189, DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2012.676650.
 
20.
Zanchetta M., Tavernini D., Sorniotto A., Gruber P., Lenzo B., Ferrara A., et al.: Trailer control through vehicle yaw moment control: Theoretical analysis and experimental assessment. Mechatronics. 2019, 64, 102282, DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2019.102282.
 
21.
Zong C.F., Zhu T.J., Wang C., Liu H.Z.: Multi-objective stability control algorithm of heavy tractor semi-trailer based on differential braking. Chinese journal of mechanical engineering. 2012, 25(1), 88–97, DOI: 10.3901/CJME.2012.01.088.
 
eISSN:2084-476X