RESEARCH PAPER
The Integration of Passenger Transport and Integration Barriers
Oi Ewhrudjakpor 1  
,  
Adela Poliaková 2  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Federal Road Safety Corps, Nigeria
2
Economics, University of Zilina, Slovak Republic
3
Road and Urban Transport, University of Zilina, Slovak Republic
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Adela Poliaková   

Economics, University of Zilina, Slovak Republic
Publish date: 2019-09-30
Submission date: 2019-09-06
Final revision date: 2019-09-24
Acceptance date: 2019-09-25
 
The Archives of Automotive Engineering – Archiwum Motoryzacji 2019;85(3):103–113
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Transport strategy in European Union supports public transport against individual transport. The reason is using of public transport is possible to fulfil all the goals of the EU strategy in the field of road safety. The paper deals with the issue of supporting public passenger transport and it is integration with the aim of ensuring the sustainable mobility of population. The aim of this paper is to identify the importance of public passenger transport and define method for creating effective integrated transport systems. The paper points to the importance of public passenger transport and the reasons why the population prefers cars. Based on the analysis, it is arguable that public passenger transport without mutual integration is not capable enough to compete with individual motoring. Contribution proposes the process integration of public passenger transport as a key elements in increasing road safety. Contribution confirms the hypothesis that the integration of public passenger transport and achieving a higher use of public passenger transport of population can contribute to improving of road safety.
 
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Banister D.: Unsustainable transport. City transport in the new century. London: Routledge, 2005.
 
2.
Dydkowski G.: Integracja lokalnego transportu zbiorowego. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Transport. 2005, 58, 107-116.
 
3.
Greiving S.: Wegener M.: Integration of transport and land use planning: state of the art. Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Transport Research. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 2003.
 
4.
Hine J.: Integration integration integration … Planning for sustainable and integrated transport systems in the new millennium. Transport Policy. 2000, 7(3),175-177, DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00025-1.
 
5.
Hull A.: Integrated transport planning in the UK: from concept to reality. Journal of Transport Geography. 2005, 13(4), 318-328, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.12.002.
 
6.
Ibrahim M.F.: Improvements and integration of a public transport system: the case of Singapore. Cities. 2003, 20(3), 205-216, DOI: 10.1016/S0264-2751(03)00014-3.
 
7.
Jones P.M.: Urban road pricing: public acceptability and barriers to implementation. In: Button, K.J., Verhoef, E.T. (Eds.), Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. 1998.
 
8.
Jones, P.M., Lucas, K., Whittles, M.: Evaluating and implementing transport measures in a wider policy context: the Civilising cities initiative. Transport Policy. 2003, 10(3), 209-221, DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00022-2.
 
9.
Kingham S., Travelling to work: will people move out of their cars. Transport Policy. 2001, 2(8), 151-160, DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00005-1.
 
10.
Klotildi S.: Public Transport Integration: the Case Study of Thessaloniki, Greece. Transportation Research Procedia. 2014, 4, 535-552, DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.041.
 
11.
Konečný V., Gnap J., Šimková I.: Impact of fiscal decentralization on motor vehicle taxation in the Slovak Republic. Transport and telecommunication. 2016, 17(1), 28-39, DOI: 10.1515/ttj-2016-0004.
 
12.
May A.D., Kelly Ch., Shepherd S.: The principles of integration in urban transport strategies. Transport Policy. 2006, 13(4), 319-327, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.005.
 
13.
May A.D., Karlstrom A., Marler N., Matthews B., Minken H., Monzon A., Page M., Pfaffenbichler P., Shepherd S.: Developing Sustainable Urban Land Use and Transport Strategies. A Decision Makers’ Guidebook, Institute for Transport Studies, Leeds, 2005.
 
14.
May A.D., Roberts M.: The design of integrated transport strategies. Transport Policy. 1995, 2(2), 97-105, DOI: 10.1016/0967-070X(95)91989-W.
 
15.
Miller M.A.: Assessment of Service Integration Practices for Public Transportation: Review of the Literature. California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways. 2004.
 
16.
Mohring H.: Optimisation and scale economies in urban bus transportation. American Economic Review. 1972, 62(4), 591-604.
 
17.
NEA, OGM and TSU, 2003. Integration and regulatory structures in public transport. Final Report. Project leader NEA Transport research and training. Study commissioned by: European Commission DG TREN, Rijswijk.
 
18.
Nedeliakova E., Sekulova J., Nedeliak I., Abramovic B.: Application of Raymond Fisk model in research of service quality. Komunikacie. 2016, 18(2), 11-14.
 
19.
Nielsen G., Nelson J.D., Mulley C., Tegnér G., Lind G., Lange T.: HiTrans best practise guide 2: Public Transport-Planning the Networks. HiTrans. 2005.
 
20.
Nosal K., Solecka K.: Application of AHP method for multi-criteria evaluation of variants of the integration of urban public transport. Transportation Research Procedia. 2014, 3, 269-278, DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.006.
 
21.
Nosal K., Starowicz W.: Wybrane zagadnienia zarządzania mobilnością. Transport Miejski i Regionalny. 2010, 3, 26-31.
 
22.
Poliak M., Semanová Š., Poliaková A.: Risk allocation in transport public service contracts Ekonomski Pregled. 2015, 66(4), 384-403.
 
23.
Poliak M., Semanová Š., Varjan P.: The effectiveness of supporting public passenger transport from public funds. Transport and communications. 2016, 1, 10-16.
 
24.
Poliak M.: Marketing in public passenger transport. Perner´s Contacts. 2011, 6(4), 320-325.
 
25.
Poliak M.: Relationship with reasonable profit and risk in public passenger transport in the Slovak Republic (in Slovak). Ekonomicky casopis. 2013, 61(2), 206-220.
 
26.
Preston J.: What’s so funny about peace, love and transport integration? Research in Transportation Economics. 2010, 29(1), 329-338, DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.07.042.
 
27.
QUATRO, Project of the European Union (Working Papers), D2: Definition and evaluation of quality in urban passenger transportation, D3: tendering and contracting of urban passenger transportation services, D4: Link between customer satisfaction and quality indices, Brussels, 1997.
 
28.
Rivasplata C.: Three perspectives on the role of competitive tendering in the integration of public transport. 22nd Southern African Transport Conference. Pretoria, South Africa: Southern African Transport Conference (SATC), (2003).
 
29.
Solecka K.: Wielokryterialna ocena wariantów zintegrowanego systemu miejskiego transportu publicznego. Praca doktorska. Politechnika Krakowska, 2013.
 
30.
Vuchic V.R.: Transportation for livable cities. New Jersey: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 1999.
 
31.
Wegener M.: Synergies between policies in policy packages. PROPOLIS Technical Note S7W10. Spiekermann and Wegener, Dortmund, 2004.
 
32.
Wesołowski J.: Miasto w Ruchu. Dobre praktyki w organizowaniu transportu miejskiego. Instytut Spraw Obywatelskich. Łódź, 2008.
 
33.
White Paper Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal..., access 24.09.2019).
 
34.
Yannis G., Weijermars W., Gitelman V., Vis M., Chaziris A., Papadimitriou E. et al.: Road Safety Performance Indicators for the Interurban Road Network. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2013, 60(11), 384-395, DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.012.
 
35.
Yiu K.A.: An Integrated Public Transport System – A Case Study of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong, 2005, DOI: 10.5353/th_b3167532.
 
eISSN:2084-476X