Evaluation of the actions aimed at the transition to sustainable public transport system
More details
Hide details
Publication date: 2018-09-28
The Archives of Automotive Engineering – Archiwum Motoryzacji 2018;81(3):75-90
The twentieth century, which became a period of unprecedented growth of cities and urbanization, revealed the need of mankind to develop and implement the principles of sustainable development. Possible ways to shift to sustainable transport system (such as the use of alternative fuel and transition to public and non-motorized modes of transport) are discussed in this article. The objective of this publication is to assess efficiency of such methods’ implementation on the example of the concrete city. Authors have suggested to change the bus route network, the structure of the bus fleet on the routes and to replace public transport buses by the new ones run on methane. To check these suggestions, authors have built the new one transport model and have simulated three cases: the existing route network and bus fleet’s structure, the proposed new one route network with buses run on diesel fuel and the proposed new one route network with buses run on methane. To evaluate efficiency, authors have assessed economic efficiency, positive social effect, environmental friendliness and sustainability of the urban transport system. Economic efficiency is achieved by reducing overruns and fuel costs thanks to the use of buses run on methane. The social effect is in the reduction of: 1) the delivery time by the route network optimization, 2) the likelihood of traffic jams, and 3) the downtime of buses at the bus stops. Since congestions increase pollutant emissions, route network optimization reduces negative impact on the environment. Replacing public transport buses by the new ones run on methane gives the same positive effect. To assess sustainability of the urban transport city is the most difficult task. The authors have identified indicators and used the radar map to compare possible solutions.
European Environment Agency. Transitions towards a more sustainable mobility system. EEA Report No. 34, 2016.
Schippl J, Gudmundsson H, Sørensen C.H, Anderton K, Brand R, Leiren M.D, Reichenbach M. Different pathways for achieving cleaner urban areas: a roadmap towards the white paper goal for urban transport. Transportation Research Procedia. 2016 (14); 2604-2613.
Special Section on light rail and urban sustainability. Generating opportunities for city sustainability through investments in light rail systems. J. of Transport Geography. 2016 (54); 369-372.
Steurer N, Bonilla D. Building sustainable transport futures for the Mexico City Metropolitan Area. Transport Policy. 2016 (52); 121-133.
Stapleton L, Sorrell S, Schwanen T. Estimating direct rebound effects for personal automotive travel in Great Britain. Energy Economics. 2016 (54); 313-325.
Chitnis M, Sorrell S, Druckman A, Firth S.K, Jackson T. Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups. Ecological Economics. 2014 (106); 12-32.
Lecca P, McGregor P.G, Swales J.K, Turner K. The added value from a general equilibrium analysis of increased efficiency in household energy use. Ecological Economics. 2014 (100); 51-62.
Sorrell S. The Rebound Effect: An Assessment of the Evidence for Economy-Wide Energy Savings from Improved Energy Efficiency, London 2007.
Brand C, Goodman A, Ogilvie D. Evaluating the impacts of new walking and cycling infrastructure on carbon dioxide emissions from motorized travel: A controlled longitudinal study. Applied Energy. 2014 (128); 284-295.
(cited: 20 July 2018).
Goodman A, Sahlqvis Sh, Ogilvie D. New Walking and Cycling Routes and Increased Physical Activity: One- and 2-Year Findings From the UK iConnect Study. American Journal of Public Health. 2014 (104(9)); 38-46.
Duran-Fernandez R, Santos G. A regional model of road accessibility in Mexico: Accessibility surfaces and robustness analysis. Research in Transportation Economics 2014 (46); 55-69.
Nordbakke S, Schwanen T. Transport, unmet activity needs and wellbeing in later life: exploring the links. Transportation. 2015 (42); 1129–1151.
Holden E, Linnerud K, Banister D. Sustainable development: Our Common Future revisited. Global Environmental Change. 2014 (26); 130-139.
19. /in/en/sustainable_cities/ideas/ (cited: 20 July 2018).
Makarova I, Pashkevich A, Shubenkova K, Mukhametdinov E. Ways to Increase Population Mobility through the Transition to Sustainable Transport. Procedia Engineering. 2017 (187); 756-762.
Makarova I, Pashkevich A, Shubenkova K. Ensuring Sustainability of Public Transport System through Rational Management. Procedia Engineering. 2017 (178); 137-146.
CAD Software Using for Designing of Traffic Environment
Kristián Čulík, Veronika Harantová, Ambróz Hájnik
Transportation Research Procedia
Comparison of Price and Emission Levels of Air Passenger Transport and International Bus Transport in the Slovak Republic
Tomáš Settey, Jozef Gnap
Transportation Research Procedia
Analysis of Passenger Behaviour During the Covid-19 Pandemic Situation
Vladimíra Štefancová, Veronika Harantová, Jaroslav Mazanec, Jaroslav Mašek, Hana Foltýnová
LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics
Best practice in urban transport decarbonisation: a case study of three initiatives in Brisbane
Anais Fabre, Michael Howes, Tom Deweerdt
Australian Planner
The Micromobility Tendencies of People and Their Transport Behavior
Alica Kalašová, Kristián Čulík
Applied Sciences
Declaration of availability
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top