PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
Intensity of use of hybrid vehicles during the initial period of their operation
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Vehicles i Transportation, Military University of Technology (WAT), Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Polska
2
-, Research Network Łukasiewicz-Automotive Industry Institute (Łukasiewicz-PIMOT, Polska
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Mateusz Ziubiński   

Institute of Vehicles i Transportation, Military University of Technology (WAT), Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, gen. Sylwestra Kaliskiego 2, 00-908, Warszawa, Polska
Submission date: 2022-04-11
Final revision date: 2022-06-06
Acceptance date: 2022-06-10
Publication date: 2022-06-30
 
The Archives of Automotive Engineering – Archiwum Motoryzacji 2022;96(2):31–50
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Extensive environmental protection activities include the promotion of alternative drive systems for motor vehicles. An important role in this field is played by hybrid vehicles, with their low operation costs being a strong marketing argument. Can such economies be conducive to the intensity of use of hybrid vehicles compared with vehicles with conventional drive systems? To answer this question, the intensity of use of hybrid vehicles was observed in a few different countries. The attention was focused on the occurrence of extreme (very low and very high) mileage values within comparable vehicle groups. The survey carried out has revealed distinct differences in the intensity of use of hybrid vehicles compared with motor vehicles with conventional drive systems (IC). The average mileage values for hybrid vehicles are higher than those recorded for conventional ones during the same period, but this difference can only be seen in the initial period of vehicle use, rapidly decreasing with vehicle operation years. The share of vehicles with extreme mileage values recorded during the period under observation, presented in the paper in several ways, declines with the years of vehicle use. In spite of that, however, the percentage of vehicles with extreme mileage values is high in HVs group against IC.
 
REFERENCES (41)
1.
Air quality in Europe, European Environment Agency, Report No 12/2018, Denmark.
 
2.
Aparicio Á.: Transport adaptation policies in Europe: from incremental actions to long-term visions. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017, 25, 3529–3537, DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.277.
 
3.
Bansal P., Kockelman K.M., Wang Y.: Hybrid electric vehicle ownership and fuel economy across Texas: an application of spatial models. Transportation Research Record. 2015, 2495(1), 53–64, DOI: 10.3141/2495-06.
 
4.
Chanaron J.J., Teske J.: Hybrid vehicles: a temporary step. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience. 2007, 7(4), 268–288, DOI: 10.1504/IJATM.2007.017061.
 
5.
d’Arcier B.F., Lecler Y.: Promoting next generation vehicles in Japan: the smart communities and their experimentations. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management. 2017, 14(3/4), 324–346, DOI: 10.1504/IJATM.2014.065296.
 
6.
Davis S.C., Williams S.E., Boundy R.G.: Transportation Energy Data Book Edition 35. Center for Transportation Analysis Energy and Transportation Science Division. 2016, DOI: 10.2172/1767864.
 
7.
De Haan P., Peters A., Mueller M.: Comparison of buyers of hybrid and conventional internal combustion engine automobiles: characteristics, preferences, and previously owned vehicles. Transportation research record. 2006, 1983(1), 106–113, DOI: 10.1177/0361198106198300115.
 
8.
European Vehicle Market Statistics 2013, 2017, http://eupocketbook.theicct.or... (accessed on 05.02.2022).
 
9.
Gerard D.P., Fischbeck S., Mathews H.S.: Diesel and Hybrids Don't Mix: Perceptions of the Interested Public and Actual Driving Behavior of New Car Owners. Transportation research record. 2007, 2017(1), 33–40, DOI: 10.3141/2017-05.
 
10.
Greene D.L., Liu J., Khattak A.J., Wali B., Hopson J.L.: Goeltz R.: How does on-road fuel economy vary with vehicle cumulative mileage and daily use? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2017, 55, 142–161, DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.004.
 
11.
Hamamoto M.: An empirical study on the behavior of hybrid-electric vehicle purchasers. Energy Policy. 2019, 125, 286–292, DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.042.
 
12.
Hamzah M.I., Tanwir N.S.: Do pro-environmental factors lead to purchase intention of hybrid vehicles? The moderating effects of environmental knowledge. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021, 279, 123643, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123643.
 
13.
He H., Fan J., Li Y., Li J.: When to switch to a hybrid electric vehicle: A replacement optimisation decision. Journal of cleaner production. 2017, 148, 295–303, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.140.
 
14.
Hoen A., Koetse M.J.: A choice experiment on alternative fuel vehicle preferences of private car owners in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2014, 61, 199–215, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.008.
 
15.
Info-Ekspert Computer system. Catalogs. www.info-ekspert.pl (accessed on 05.02.2022).
 
16.
Kaneko M., Kagawa S.: Driving propensity and vehicle lifetime mileage: A quantile regression approach. Journal of environmental management. 2021, 278, 111499, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111499.
 
17.
Liu Y.Z.: Household demand and willingness to pay for hybrid vehicles. Energy Economics. 2014, 44, 191–197, DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.027.
 
18.
McLeay F., Yoganathan V., Osburg V.S., Pandit A.: Risks and drivers of hybrid car adoption: A cross-cultural segmentation analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018, 189, 519–528, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.031.
 
19.
Meurs H., Haaijer R., Geurs K.T.: Modeling the effects of environmentally differentiated distance-based car-use charges in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2013, 22, 1–9, DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2013.02.013.
 
20.
Mitropoulos L.K., Prevedouros P.D., Kopelias P.: Total cost of ownership and externalities of conventional, hybrid and electric vehicle. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017, 24, 267–274, DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.117.
 
21.
National Travel Survey. Statistical Release Department of Transport. UK 2019. national.travelsurvey@dft.gsi.gov.uk (accessed on 05.02.2022).
 
22.
Orbach Y., Fruchter G.E.: Forecasting sales and product evolution: The case of the hybrid/electric car. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2011, 78(7), 1210–1226, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.018.
 
23.
Peters A., de Haan P., Scholz R.W.: Understanding Car-Buying Behavior: Psychological Determinants of Energy Efficiency and Practical Implications. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2015, 9(1), 59–72, DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.732672.
 
24.
Plötz P., Funke S.Á., Jochem P.: The impact of daily and annual driving on fuel economy and CO2 emissions of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2018, 118, 331–340, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.09.018.
 
25.
Prochowski L.: Characteristic features of the process of growth in the mileage of hybrid vehicles. Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport. 2018, 25(4), 361–368, DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.4811.
 
26.
Prochowski L.: Evaluation of the process of mileage growth during the operation of motor trucks, in several categories of engine cubic capacity. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability. 2018, 20(3), 359–369, DOI: 10.17531/ein.2018.3.3.
 
27.
Pukalskas S., Rimkus A., Melaika M., Pečeliūnas R.: Comparison of conventional and hybrid cars exploitation costs. Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal. 2018, 12(1), 221–227, DOI: 10.12913/22998624/86259.
 
28.
Salisa A.R., Walker P.D., Zhang N., Zhu J.G.: Comparative cost-based analysis of a novel plug-in hybrid electric vehicle with conventional and hybrid electric vehicles. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015, 11(1), 2262–2271, hdl.handle.net/10453/121535.
 
29.
Santini D.J., Vyas A.D.: Introduction of hybrid and diesel vehicles: status within the life cycle of technology adoption. Transportation research record. 2005, 1941(1), 18–25, DOI: 10.1177/0361198105194100103.
 
30.
Ščasný M., Zvěřinová I., Czajkowski M.: Electric, plug-in hybrid, hybrid, or conventional? Polish consumers' preferences for electric vehicles. Energy Efficiency. 2018, 11(3–4), 2181–2201, DOI: 10.1007/s12053-018-9754-1.
 
31.
Tanaka Y., Sihigeta Y.: Upcoming Advances in the Hybrid Vehicle Market. NRI Papers. 2007, 114.
 
32.
Thies C., Kieckhäfer K., Spengler T.S.: Market introduction strategies for alternative powertrains in long-range passenger cars under competition. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2016, 45, 4–27, DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2015.05.002.
 
33.
Transport Activity Results in 2014, Central Statistical Office, Warsaw 2015.
 
34.
U.S. Automotive Market and Industry in 2025, Center for Automotive Research, 2011.
 
35.
Van Vliet O.P.R., Kruithof T., Turkenburg W.C. Faaij A.P.: Techno-economic comparison of series hybrid, plug-in hybrid, fuel cell and regular cars. Journal of power sources. 2010, 195(19), 6570–6585, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.077.
 
36.
World Bank/World Development Indicators/GDP per capita 2019.
 
37.
www.oica.net/wp-content/upload... (accessed on 05.02.2022).
 
38.
www.theicct.org/sites/default/... (accessed on 07.02.2022).
 
39.
www.theicct.org/sites/default/... (accessed on 07.02.2022).
 
40.
www.pzpm.org.pl/pl/Rynek-motor... (accessed on 05.02.2022).
 
41.
Zhu X.Y., Liu C.: Investigating the neighborhood effect on hybrid vehicle adoption. Transportation research record. 2013, 2385(1), 37–44, DOI: 10.3141/2385-05.
 
Declaration of availability
 
eISSN:2084-476X