PRACA ORYGINALNA
Design of placing the container reloading station by applying the Operations Research methods: a research study
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Department of Transport and Logistics, Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, Faculty of Technology, Okružní 517/10, 370 01, České Budějovice, Czech Republic, Czech Republic
AUTOR DO KORESPONDENCJI
Ondrej Stopka   

Department of Transport and Logistics, Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, Faculty of Technology, Okružní 517/10, 370 01, České Budějovice, Czech Republic, Czech Republic
Data publikacji: 30-09-2019
Data nadesłania: 10-09-2019
Data ostatniej rewizji: 18-09-2019
Data akceptacji: 23-09-2019
 
The Archives of Automotive Engineering – Archiwum Motoryzacji 2019;85(3):123–136
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE ARTYKUŁU
The manuscript is focused on the design of methodical procedure to locate container reloading station of national importance in the examined country. Slovakia represents the investigated country where ten container reloading stations , specialized above all in transshipment of loading units, are currently in operation. The introductory parts of the manuscript outline the most important concepts associated with the very term of intermodal transport, container reloading stations in the given country as well as a brief literature review in a given context. The following parts discuss the specification of relevant data and methods for this study as well as a description of the general procedure of multi-criteria evaluation of alternatives; namely consisting of, identifying a set of alternatives (Slovak regions), establishing a set of criteria and determining the weights of such criteria. The last part of the manuscript addresses forming a criteria matrix and subsequent calculations in order to search for the most suitable region when applying particular techniques of Operations Research. Specifically, the weights of criteria being determined based on the Saaty quantitative pairwise comparison method, and the final procedure in the context of selecting the most suitable alternative is suggested by using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (also called as the TOPSIS method).
 
REFERENCJE (28)
1.
Anderson D.R., Sweeney D.J., Williams T.A., Camm J.D., Kipp Martin R.: An Introduction to Management Science: Quantitative Approaches to Decision Making, 2010, South-Western College Pub., 1045 p.
 
2.
Awasthi A., Chauhan S.S., Goyal S.K.: A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2011, 53, 98-109, DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.07.023.
 
3.
Bauer J., Bektaş T., Crainic T.G., Minimizing greenhouse gas emissions in intermodal freight transport: an application to rail service design. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 2010, 61, 530-542, DOI: 10.1057/jors.2009.102.
 
4.
Chovancova M., Klapita V.: Draft Model for Optimization of the Intermodal Transport Chains by Applying the Network Analysis. In 20th International Scientific Conference on Transport Means - Proceedings of the International Conference. October 05-07, 2016, 112-116, Juodkrante, Lithuania.
 
5.
Chovancova M., Klapita, V.: Modeling the Supply Process Using the Application of Selected Methods of Operational Analysis. Open Enginnering. 2017, 7, 50-54, DOI: 10.1515/eng-2017-0009.
 
6.
Dey B., Bairagi B., Sarkar B., Sanyal S.K.: Warehouse location selection by fuzzy multicriteria decision making methodologies based on subjective and objective criteria. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management. 2016, 11, 262-278, DOI: 10.1080/17509653.2015.1086964.
 
7.
Dockalikova I., Klozikova J.: MCDM Methods in Practice: Localization Suitable Places for Company by the Utilization of AHP and WSA, TOPSIS Method. In Proceedings of the Conference on European Management Leadership and Governance. 2015, 543-552, Lisbon, Portugal.
 
8.
Gąska D., Margielewicz J.: Development of the Silesian logistic centres in terms of handling improvement in intermodal transport on the east-west routes (Book Chapter). Studies in Systems. Decision and Control. 2018, 155, 275-301, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78295-9_7.
 
9.
Hruška R., Průša P., Babić D.: The use of AHP method for selection of supplier. Transport. 2014, 29, 195-203, DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2014.930928.
 
10.
Hwang C.L., Yoon K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, 1981, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
 
11.
Jurkovic M., Sosedova J.: Simulation process of optimal transport department regarding to transport vehicles based on AHP method - applied to Slovakia. Asian Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2013, 1, 124-128, ISSN 2321-2462.
 
12.
Kampf R., Hlatka M., Savin G.: Proposal for optimizing specific distribution routes by means of the specific method of operational analysis. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina. 2017, 19, 133-138, ISSN 1335-4205.
 
13.
Kapros S., Panou K., Tsamboulas D.A.: Multicriteria approach to the evaluation of intermodal freight villages. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2005, 1906, 56-63, DOI: 10.3141/1906-07.
 
14.
Kubasáková I., Poliaková B., Krzywonos L.: The location and operation of distribution centre and the modelling. Logi - Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics. 2013, 4, 39-46, ISSN 1804-3216.
 
15.
Lizbetin J.: Methodology for Determining the Location of Intermodal Transport Terminals for the Development of Sustainable Transport Systems: A Case Study from Slovakia. Sustainability. 2019, 11, Article no. 1230, DOI: 10.3390/su11051230.
 
16.
Meszaros F., Markovits-Somogyi R., Bokor Z.: Modelling and multi-criteria optimization of road traffic flows considering social and economic aspects. Logi - Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics. 2012, 3, 70-82, ISSN 1804-3216.
 
17.
Pelegrina G.D., Duarte L.T., Romano J.M.T.: Application of independent component analysis and TOPSIS to deal with dependent criteria in multicriteria decision problems. Expert Systems with Applications. 2019, 122, 262-280.
 
18.
Petrovic M., Mlinaric T.J., Semanjski I.: Location planning approach for intermodal terminals in urban and suburban rail transport. Promet -Traffic & Transportation. 2019, 31, 101-111, DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v31i1.3034.
 
19.
Qu Y., Bektaş T., Bennell J., Sustainability SI: multimode multicommodity network design model for intermodal freight transportation with transfer and emission costs. Networks and Spatial Economics. 2016, 16, 303-329, DOI: 10.1007/s11067-014-9227-9.
 
20.
Roso V., Brnjac N., Abramovic B.: Inland Intermodal Terminals Location Criteria Evaluation: The Case of Croatia. Transportation Journal. 2015, 54, 496-515, DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.54.4.0496.
 
21.
Saaty T.L.: Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World, 1990, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 292 p.
 
22.
Saaty T.L.: Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences. 2008, 1, 83-98, DOI: 10.1504/IJSSci.2008.0175.
 
23.
Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G., Wendell R.E.: Assessing Attribute Weights by Rations. Omega – International Journal of Management Science. 1983, 2, 9-13, DOI: 10.1016/0305-0483(83)90078-6.
 
24.
Statistical office of the Slovak Republic: Regional statistics of the Slovak regions in terms of GDP, foreign direct investment, amount of transported goods via roads, number of small, medium sized and large enterprises, population size, average gross monthly wage, regional road network density and regional connection to network of railway lines included in the AGTC. 2018. Available at: https://slovak.statistics.sk/w.... (Accessed 19th August 2019).
 
25.
Tadić S., Krstić M., Brnjac N.: Selection of efficient types of inland intermodal terminals. Journal of Transport Geography. 2019, 78, 170-180, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.06.004.
 
26.
Yang Y.J., Zhu X.N., Haghani A.: Multiple Equipment Integrated Scheduling and Storage Space Allocation in Rail-Water Intermodal Container Terminals Considering Energy Efficiency. Transportation Research Record. 2019, 2673, 199-209, DOI: 10.1177/0361198118825474.
 
27.
Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z.: Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods in Economics: An Overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 2011, 17, 397-427, DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2011.593291.
 
28.
Zecevic S., Tadic S., Krstic M.: Intermodal Transport Terminal Location Selection Using a Novel Hybrid MCDM Model. International Journal of Uncertainty fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems. 2017, 25, 853-876, DOI: 10.1142/S0218488517500362.
 
eISSN:2084-476X